A.S.PACHHAPURE
Mary George – Appellant
Versus
N. D. H. Enterprises – Respondent
Misc.Cvl. 9339/2010 is filed under Section 45(4) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, praying to stop all further proceedings in the above case.
ORDERS ON MISC.CVL.9339/2010 AND MISC.CVL.9338/2010
1. These applications have been filed by the landlord under Section 45 (4) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act of 1999’ for short) to stop all further proceedings and to make an order directing to put the landlord in possession of the premises or dismiss the revision petitions.
2. The facts relevant for the purpose of these applications are as under:
The applicant herein is the landlord and is respondent in these revision petitions, whereas the opponent in these petitions is the tenant in possession of the petition premises and has filed these revision petitions against the eviction decrees passed in HRC Nos.560/1999 and 564/1999 vide order dated 15-04-2004 under Section 5 of the Act of 1999 by the Chief Judge of the Small Causes Court.
3. I will be referring to the parties as landlord and tenant for the purpose of convenience.
4. The landlord filed HRC Nos.560/1999 and 564/1999 seeking eviction of the tenant of the ground under Section 21 (1) (h) an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.