A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA, N.KUMAR
C. R. Shivananda – Appellant
Versus
H. C. Gurusiddappa – Respondent
1. These two regular first appeals are filed by defendants 2 and 3 and defendants-5 and 6 in the suit, against the judgment and decree of the trial Court, which has decreed the suit of the plaintiffs, removing second and third defendants from constructive trusteeship, directing them to deliver possession of the property to the first defendant and appointing the first defendant as the sole trustee.
2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the original suit.
3. The suit schedule property consists of three items, all situated in Chickmagalur Town. Item No.1 is known as ‘Uppali Mutt’, item No.2 is known as ‘Hosmutt’ and item No.3 is ‘Karisiddeswar Mutt’.
4. The plaintiffs preferred the suit under Section 92 of Code of Civil Procedure. (for short, hereunder referred to as CPC). Their case is that they are Veerashaivas by their religion,. The first defendant is the Mahant of the Kodi Matha Mahasamstana, which is a Veerashaiva Mutt. The said ‘Kodi Mutt’ has various subordinate branch Mutts and properties attached and owned by such subordinate, branch Mutts. The first defendant and his predecessors have and had not only the right
The Bihar State Board of Religious Trust
Pragdasji V Ishwarlalbhai AIR 1952 SC 143
Tirumalai Devasthanams v Krishnayya AIR 1943 Mad 466 (FB)
Sugra Bibi V Hazi Kummu Mia (1969) 3 SCR 83=(AIR 1969 SC 884)
R. Venugopala Naidu & ors. V Venkarayulu Naidu Charities & ors. AIR 1990 SC 444
Vidyodaya Trust V Mohan Prasad R [(2008) 4 SCC 115]
Thayarammal (Dead) By Lrs. V Kanakammal & ors. AIR 2005 SC 1588
A.A. Gopalakrishnan V Cochin Devaswom Board & ors. (2007) 7 SCC 482
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.