SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Kar) 586

ARALI NAGARAJ
State of Karnataka by Nanjangud Rural Police Station – Appellant
Versus
Lingappa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : A.V. Ramakrishna, HCGP.
For the Respondents:

Judgment :-

Arali Nagaraj, J.

Despite receipt of notice of this appeal, the respondents No.1 to 4, who were

respectively accused Nos. 1 to 4 before the Trail Court, have remained absent.

2. Heard Sri. A.V. Ramakrishna, the Learned High Court Government Pleader, and perused the impugned order.

3. This appeal is by the complainant-State aggrieved by the order dated 15.12.2008 passed in CC No.780/2007 by the Learned Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Nanjangud (hereinafter referred to as ‘Trail Court’ for short), acquitting all the accused Nos. 1 to 4 (respondents herein) of the offences under Sections 341, 323 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC.

4. The facts leading to the present appeal are as under:

All the accused Nos. 1 to 4 were chargesheeted by the police of Nanjangud PS for the offences under Sections 341, 323 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC. The charge was framed against all the accused therein for the said offences on 24.6.2008. The said case stood posted to 15.1.2009 for recording further evidence for the prosecution and summons and NBWS were issued to the charge witnesses.

5. On 15.12.2008, the learned JMFC advanced the case suo-motu from 15.1.2009 and by his impugned order clo
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top