SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Kar) 508

ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI
Karisiddama – Appellant
Versus
Sanna Kenchamma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S.V. Prakash, Advocate.

ORDER

The petitioners have raised the challenge to the order, dated 12/12/2008 passed by the Court of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) at Honnali on I.A. No.IV in O.S.No.182/2007 (Annexure-B).

2. The facts of the case in brief are that the respondent filed the suit against the respondents seeking the relief of permanent injunction. In the said suit proceedings, she also made I.A.No.I for the grant of temporary injunction. The Trial Court, by its order, dated 15/4/2008 granted the temporary injunction after hearing both the sides. The respondent filed I.A.No.IV ventilating her grievance before the Trial Court that the petitioners are unnecessarily obstructing her in the use of the road. It was the further grievance of the respondent that she approached the police seeking their protection but in vain. She therefore had to file the said I.A. seeking a direction to the Police Sub-Inspector (P.S.I. for short). Honnali to give police protection to the respondent for enjoying the suit schedule property. The Trial Court, by its order, dated 12/12/2008 allowed I.A.No.IV by directing the P.S.I., Honnali to give necessary police protection to the respondent, her family members and her coolies to make













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top