SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Kar) 157

MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR
Nagashetty – Appellant
Versus
Basawaraj – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Smt. Hema L. Kulkarni, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. By the impugned order the Executing Court has held that the Execution Petition is maintainable.

2. The petitioner herein is a mortgagee and the respondent is a mortgager. The respondent herein had mortgaged the property by virtue of the mortgage deed dated 22.03.1993, which was registered for `15,000/-. The same is an usufructory mortgage for a period of 5 years. After 5 years, the possession was not re-delivered. Hence the respondent herein filed a suit in O.S.No.285/2004 for redemption of mortgage, which came to be decreed on 27.11.2007. The same was confirmed in R.A.No.155/2007 on 21.06.2008. The same has attained finality. Thereafter the decree holder filed E.P.No.302/2008 for getting the decree executed. From that day onwards, the Execution Petition is being dragged on.

When the facts stood thus, the judgment debtor raised a question relating to maintainability of the Execution Petition. The objection of the petitioner herein is, in the absence of final decree, the Execution Petition should not go on.

3. From the grounds urged before the Court below as well as the grounds before this Court, it is clear that the petitioner being the judgment debtor wants to drag o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top