SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Kar) 849

S.R.BANNURMATH, SUBHASH B.ADI
Narappa Gouda – Appellant
Versus
Tulasawwa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.H.Sawkar, P.H.Gotkhindi, V.T.Raya Reddy,

JUDGMENT

( 1. ) BOTH these appeals arise out of the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 10/1994 dated 19th August 1997 on the file of 1st Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Dharwad. R. F. A. No. 734/1997 is by the defendants-1 to 4, R. F. A. No. 755/1997 is by the plaintiff.

( 2. ) PARTIES will be referred to as per their ranking in the trial Court. Suit is one for partition and separate possession of l/6th share by metes and bounds.

( 3. ) PLAINTIFF is the mother of defendant Nos. 1 and 5. Defendant Nos. 2 and 4 are children of defendant No. 1. The genealogy of the family is as under : Venkanagouda Patil died on 24-1-1964, leaving behind the plaintiff-wife, defendant no. 1 - son and defendant No. 5 - daughter. After the death of Venkanagouda Patil, defendant No. 1 relinquished his right, title and interest over the suit property in favour of his then minor sons - defendant Nos. 2 to 4 by means of mutation entry No. 2507. Accordingly, the names of defendant Nos. 2 to 4 were mutated in the record of rights both to the agricultural lands and the house properties. It is because of the said entry in the record of rights, defendant Nos. 2 to 4 are also made as party to the suit.

( 4. ) PLAINT





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top