SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Kar) 422

N.KUMAR
Vishnu – Appellant
Versus
Abdulgani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:F.V. Patil, Advocate.
For the Respondent:V.P. Kulkarni, Sadiq N. Goodwale, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

This is a plaintiff's second appeal against the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below that the plaintiff is not entitled to decree of specific performance and is only entitled to decree of recovery of money paid under the agreement of sale. In fact, the defendant has also filed cross-objections challenging the findings of the Courts below regarding the proof of execution of the agreement of sale and payment of consideration under the agreement of sale.

2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the original suit.

3. The subject matter of the suit is the non-agricultural land comprised in CTS No.2093/B measuring 2889.10 sq. mtrs. situated in Ayodhya Nagar within the limits of Hubli-Dharwad Municipal Corporation in CTS Ward No.5. Prior to its conversion, the schedule property was a part of the southern portion of R.S.No.16 measuring 29 guntas. For short, the said property is referred to as 'the schedule property'.

4. Defendant is the owner of agricultural land bearing schedule property. He was interested to sell the schedule property and the plaintiff was willing to purchase the same. The terms of sale and purchase of
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top