SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Kar) 356

AJIT J.GUNJAL
Sreedhar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Soumya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:M.B. Chandrachooda, Advocate.

Judgment

1. Even though the matter is listed for preliminary hearing, with consent it is taking up for final disposal.

2. This petition is by the husband, Respondent is the wife. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was performed on 16-4-2009 and the same was registered on 20-4-2009. It is the case of the petitioner that they stayed together only for three months. Petitioner-husband has filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of the marriage on the ground of cruetly and desertion. During the said proceedings, the respondent makes an application under Section 24 seeking interim maintenance. The said application is seriously opposed by the petitioner-husband. Learned Family Judge has awarded a sum of Rs. 10,000/-as interim maintenance and Rs. 25,000/-towards litigation expenses. The said order is questioned in this writ petition.

3. Mr. Chandrachooda, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned Family Judge has clearly erred in awarding maintenance as well as litigation expenses inasmuch as without any material finding is recorded that the petitioner is earning Rs.1,50,000/- p.m. whereas it is not so








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top