JAWAD RAHIM
State by Excise Inspector Shimoga Police – Appellant
Versus
Pachhappa – Respondent
1. Heard.
2. This is a State’s appeal against the acquittal of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 32, 34, 38-A and 43 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.
3. Heard the learned HCGP Sri Raja Subramanya Bhat.
4. The Counsel for the respondent-accused is absent.
5. The perusal of the records shows that the Inspector of Excise, Shimoga, initiated investigation against the accused and conducted a raid at 11.45 a.m. on 25-9-1998 and found the respondent-accused was in possession of 8.640 liters of non-tax paid Indian liquor. It was stored in front of his house situate at Tamillians Street, Mattur Village, Shimoga Taluk. On being questioned, the accused failed to produce any documents regarding payment of tax and excise over the quantity of liquor in his possession. Consequently, it was seized.
6. On culmination of investigation, the charge-sheet was filed and accused was put to trial. The Inspector of Excise concerned did not produce any witness during the trial to support the charge raised against the respondent-accused for offences punishable under Sections 32, 34, 38-A and 43 of the Karnataka Excise Act. The learned Trial Judge has recorded in clear terms
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.