SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Kar) 76

High Court of Karnataka
K. SREEDHAR RAO & S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.
Girish Chandra & Others
Versus
The State by Lokayuktha Police Yadgir, rep by its Inspector of Police & Another
Criminal Petition Nos. 15941 & 15852 of 2012 C/W
Decided On : 05-02-2013

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:M.S. Bhagwat, Ravi B. Patil, Advocates.
For the Respondents:B.A. Bellippa, Advocate.

The central legal point established in the judgment is that in trap cases, the registration of FIR before embarking upon the protocol of rapid is mandatory to prevent misuse of powers and demoralization of public administration.

Headnote:

Investigating Officer - Registration of FIR - [LALITA-KUMARI vs STATE of U.P. AND OTHERS (2012)4 SCC 1] - The court discussed the conflicting views on the registration of FIR, emphasizing the importance of registration of FIR in trap cases and the necessity of following the protocol of investigation by the investigating officer. The court highlighted that in trap cases, recording of complainant and submission of FIR to the jurisdictional Court before embarking upon the protocol of rapid is mandatory.

Fact of the Case:

The investigating officer received credible information about illegal activities at the Sub-Registrar's office, conducted raids, seized money, and then registered the FIR.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that in trap cases, the registration of FIR before embarking upon the protocol of rapid is mandatory and that surprise raids without FIR demoralize public administration.

Issues: The court considered whether the investigating officer is bound to register the FIR before embarking upon the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in trap cases, the registration of FIR before embarking upon the protocol of rapid is mandatory to prevent misuse of powers and demoralization of public administration.

Final Decision: The matter was remitted to the learned Single Judge for disposal in accordance with law, and the registry was directed to send a copy of the order to the Home Secretary and the Director General of Police to comply with the observations made.

Judgment :-

K. Sreedhar Rao, Ag. C.J.

1. The generic question as to whether the investigating Officer should first register the FIR and thereupon embark upon investigation is seized by the Larger Bench of the Supreme Court inthe case of LALITA- KUMARI vs STATE of U.P. AND OTHERS [(2012)4 SCC 1]. There were Conflicting views with regard to the registration of FIR. One view is to the effect that the investigating officer has discretion to make a preliminary enquiry before registering the FIR. The counter view was to the effect that the investigating officer has no discretion but to register the FIR and thereafter to embark upon investigation.

2. In criminal petition No.15941/2012, the facts reveal that the investigating officer gets credible information that in the Sub-Registrar’s office, the Sub-Registrar is demanding and accepting bribe from the public,who are presenting their documents for registration. The investigating officer, without registering the said information, proceeds to the Sub-Registrar’s office. Upon search of the Sub-Registra’rs and other officials, he does not find any money in their possession, but from other persons who are in the office and who are not the officials, substantial sums are found in possession. The investigating officer draws up mahazar,seizes the money from the said persons and thereafter arrests the Sub-Registrar, the official staff and all others from whom the amount is seized, comes back to the police station and registers the FIR.

3. The facts in criminal petition No.15852/2012 are that on 20.07.2012, the investigating officer gets credible information about the illegal demand and acceptance of bribe by the Sub-Registrar, Basavanabagewadi. The investigating officer proceeds to the Sub-Registrar’s office and seizs cash of Rs.11,550/- which is said to be in the possession of accused No.2- Document Writer and comes to know that accused No.1 Sub-Registrar is collecting the said amount through accused No.2 from the persons registering the documents. Thereafter, mahazar is drawn, accused persons are arrested and brought to the police station and a case is registered.

4. The learned Single Judge, in the above criminal petitions, has gone into the question as to whether registration of the FIR is a condition precedent to embark upon investigation and has made the following observations in para 26;

“26. In the aforesaid circumstances, as the registration of a crime is not a condition precedent in the circumstances stated above, with all respect at mycommand to my learned brother, I disagree with a view expressed therein. Therefore, it appears just and proper that these matters be placed before the Division Bench or a Larger Bench to consider the afore said aspects.

Hence, the Registry is directed to place these matters before the Hon’ble Chief Justice to refer these matters to a Division Bench or Larger Bench.”

The learned Single Judge has differed with the view taken by this Court in Criminal Petition No.3213/2012 and connected matters and therefore referred the matter to theDivision Bench for consideration of the substantial question of law as to,

“Whether the investigating officer is bound to register the FIR and thereafter embark upon investigation”.

5. The normal protocol of investigation in trap cases commences with recording of a complaint of a specific allegation against the specific public servant. The invesigating officer registers the complaint, would send the copy of the FIR to the jurisdictionalCourt and two panch witnesses are secured from the Government Departments. The demonstration of the effect of phenolphthalein powder on the sodium carbonate solution would be given by colour test by smearing phenolphthalein powder on the bait money produced by the complainant. Sodium carbonate solution is prepared in two bowls, the complainant is asked to handle the tainted currency notes and later on asked to dip his fingers in the solution, which would turn pink. This scientific exercise









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top