SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 435

R.V.Raveendran
God Granites – Appellant
Versus
Central Board Of Direct Taxes – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Deokinandan, K.M.L.Majele

JUDGMENT :

R.V.Raveendran, J.

1. THE petitioner is an exporter of cut and dressed granite (unpolished). According to petitioner, it selects and marks the quarrying area/rock, cuts the rock by burner/bore cutting, drills holes and after blasting, removes the blocks and exports the granite in an unpolished condition. In regard to the asst. yr. 1993-94, petitioner filed a return claiming deduction of the profit derived by the export of such unpolished granite from the total income under s. 80HHC of the IT Act, 1961 ('Act' for short). Petitioner contended that the material so exported is 'rock' falling under Item (x) of the Twelfth Schedule to the Act and thus the benefit of deduction under s. 80HHC was available. In response to the said return, the Assessing Officer (AO) (fourth respondent) sent an intimation dt. 31st March, 1995 (Annexure C) under s. 143(1)(a) of the Act regarding the total income, tax and interest payable by the petitioner, disallowing the deduction claimed under s. 80HHC. In the Adjustment Explanatory Sheet, attached to the said intimation, the following reason is given for the disallowance of the deduction claimed under s. 80HHC :

"80HHC is not allowed, as assessee










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top