SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 114

C.N.Aswathanarayana Rao
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Honappa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
I.R.Biradar, K.P.Bindu Kumar, M.Sowri Raju, R.Narayana.

JUDGMENT

1. THIS is an insurer's appeal on the question of liability. The accident took place at 2. 30 a. m. on the night between 5-2-1994 and 6-2-1994. The insurance policy was in effect till 21-9-1984 and had not been renewed subsequently. After the accident, during office hours on 6-2-1994 the owner went to the insurance company, paid the premium and obtained a fresh insurance policy without disclosing the happening of the accident. The insurance company contended before the tribunal that the risk commenced only when the premium was paid during office hours and therefore it is not liable to indemnify the owner with regard to the accident which took place at 2. 30 a. m. the tribunal refused to accept that contention and held that under the law the risk is deemed to have commenced from the zero hour of 6-2-1984 and therefore held that the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation amount. Being aggrieved this appeal is preferred.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The tribunal, in support of its view, has relied upon two decisions. In 1985 accidents and compensation cases 81, a division bench of the Madras High Court held that the policy is deemed to cove


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top