SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 369

V.K.Singhal
Sonarome Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India (Uoi) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
E.S.Kiresur, E.R.Indra Kumar.

JUDGMENT

V.K.Singhal, J.

1. THE validity of the provision of Sections 276C(1) and 276CC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been challenged in these writ petitions as violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. THE order dated March 22, 1996, passed under Section 279(1) of the Act for the assessment years 1988-89 to 1991-92 has been challenged as without jurisdiction. THE complaint filed before the Special Court for Economic Offences at Bangalore, is also prayed to be quashed.

2. A survey was conducted on December 7, 1995, under Section 133A of the Act. Notice under Section 148 was issued on December 15, 1995. Notices dated February 14, 1996, and March 1, 1996, were issued as to why the prosecution proceedings should not be launched against the petitioners for not filing the returns in time. The Commissioner of Income-tax not satisfied with the reply, authorised the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax to file a complaint under Sections 276C(1) and 276CC of the Act. Interest under Sections 234A, 234B and 234C has been levied by the assessing authority. It is stated that, since the returns were accepted under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act, vide assessment order dated Mar



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top