SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Kar) 13

A.R.Somnath Iyer, B.M.Kalagate
Hutti Gold Mines Company – Appellant
Versus
Ratnam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Somnath Ayyar, J.

1. A company called the Hutti Gold Mines Company, Ltd., is the appellant before us, and this appeal is presented under S. 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act in which the complaint made is that assessment of the compensation payable to one of its employees, who is the respondent before us, is excessive.

2. The employee was an underground workman in the company. On January 28, 1957 he met with an accident which admittedly arose out of and in the course of his employment. The injury which he sustained during that accident resulted in "fracture dislocation of the body of the lumbar vertebra No. 1."

On 26 October, 1957, it is stated, there was an agreement between the employee and the company that the employee should receive from the company a sum of Rs. 420 in full and final settlement of all his claims against the company. That agreement was forwarded by the company to the Commissioner of Labour who forwarded it to the Commissioner of Workmen's Compensation, Raichur, for registration under S. 28 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

3. On 10 October, 1957, the employee was discharged on the ground that he was "medically unfit."

4. On 26 May, 1958, an appl




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top