SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Kar) 217

Mohammad Sharif, S.A.Hakeem
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Karnataka (Central) – Appellant
Versus
Khoday Eswarsa And Sons – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.Shrinivasan, S.P.Bhat

JUDGMENT

Jagannatha Shetty, J.

1. The following question under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, has been referred:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, interest payment of Rs. 11,365 to Smt. K. L. Gangamma, who was one of the partners of the firm on the date of payment of interest, can be disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act,1961 ?"

2. The assessee is a firm. Originally it was constituted by an instrument dated November 21, 1969. Clause 10 of that instrument provides that in the event of death of a partner, the firm shall not be dissolved but shall be carried on by the remaining partners with the legal representatives of the deceased partner on such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon in that behalf by mutual consent. On July 30, 1973, Sri. K. L. Lakshmansa, one of the partners, died and a new partnership deed was executed on February 17, 1974, taking Smt. Gangamma, widow of Sri. K. Lakshmansa, as a partner with effect from July 31, 1973. She was taken as a partner since she represented the estate of her deceased husband.

3. Smt. Gangamma in her individual capacity advanced some amount to the firm and the firm paid interest on that amount







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top