SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Kar) 265

Mohammad Sharif, S.A.Hakeem
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Angadi Bros. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.Shrinivasan, B.V.Katageri

JUDGMENT

Jagannatha Shetty, J.

1. This is a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the "Act"). The following question, at the instance of the Revenue, has been referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench :

"Whether in law the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that an appeal lies from the order of the Income-tax Officer rejecting the assessee's declaration in Form No. 12 for continuation of registration ?"

2. The assessee is a firm in respect of which the Income-tax Officer had granted registration for the years earlier to 1975-76. For the assessment year 1975-76, the assessee filed the return of income along with a declaration in Form No. 12 on August 30, 1975. The return was due on June 30, 1975. There was thus a delay of two months in filing the return and Form No. 12. The Income-tax Officer asked the assessee to give reasons for the belated filing of Form No. 12. The assessee did not reply to the notice. On March 29, 1976, the Income-tax Officer assessed the firm as an unregistered firm by refusing renewal of registration The order was made in the following terms :

"Order under section 185 :

The assessee has filed Form No. 12 along wi
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top