SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Kar) 120

S.R.Rajasekhara Murthy
Karnataka Electricity Board Employees' Union – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.Subba Rao, K.Shrinivasan, M.Raghavendra Rao

JUDGMENT

S.R. Rajasekhara Murthy, J.

1. The question that arises for decision in this writ petition is whether dearness allowance, additional dearness allowance, city compensatory allowance and house rent allowance form part of the "salary" of the salaried employees represented by the petitioner-Union and whether the said allowances are taxable under the Income-tax Act under the head "Salaries".

2. This contention does not survive in view of the amendment to section 2(24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989 (3 of 1989), inserting sub-clauses (iii)(a) and (iii)(b) after sub-clause (iii). The clauses inserted with effect from April 1, 1962, are reproduced below :

"(iii)(a) any special allowance or benefit, other than a perquisite included under sub-clause (iii), specifically granted to the assessee to meet expenses wholly, necessarily and exclusively for the performance of the duties of an office or employment of profit;

(iii)(b) any allowance granted to the assessee either to meet his personal expenses at the place where the duties of his office or employment of profit are ordinarily performed by him or at a place where he ordinarily re





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top