High Court Of Karnataka
Hanumanthappa, J.
John - Appellants
Vs
Karnataka State Road Transport - Respondents
Decided on: Jan 13, 1994
TRANSFER - Employees' Transfer Dispute - Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation - Regulation 13(4) of the Regulations - 1981 Settlement - 1985 Settlement - 1989 Settlement - Transfer of Drivers and Conductors - Competency, Correctness and Propriety of Transfer Orders - Interpretation of Settlements - Protection of Seniority - Public Interest - Victimisation - Mala Fide Intention - Administrative Orders - Middle of the Year Transfers - Union Office Bearers - Divisionwise Posts - Administrative Grounds - Pending Enquiries - Educational Impact - Efficiency Improvement - Humanitarian Grounds
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, who are Drivers or Conductors in the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the transfer orders transferring them from one Division to another. The dispute revolved around the competency, correctness, and propriety of the transfers, as well as the interpretation of various Settlements governing the service conditions of the employees. The petitioners raised concerns about the transfers being made in the middle of the year, the impact on their families and children's education, and the alleged victimisation and mala fide intentions behind the transfers.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Corporation had the power to transfer employees, but it ignored Clause 14(c) of the 1981 Settlement in some cases. The Court held that the subsequent Settlements did not take away the effect of Clause 14(c) of the 1981 Settlement, as it was saved by the 1989 Settlement. The Court also emphasized the need for transfers to be made sparingly and in public interest, and not for punitive or extraneous reasons. It directed the Corporation to consider withdrawing the transfer orders, protecting seniority, and considering the petitioners' requests for cancellation of transfers due to humanitarian grounds and educational impact.
Issues: Competency, correctness, and propriety of transfer orders; Interpretation of Settlements; Protection of seniority; Public interest; Victimisation; Mala fide intention; Administrative orders; Middle of the year transfers; Union office bearers; Divisionwise posts; Administrative grounds; Pending enquiries; Educational impact; Efficiency improvement; Humanitarian grounds
Ratio Decidendi: The Corporation has the power to transfer employees, but it must respect the terms of the Settlements governing the service conditions of the employees. Transfers should be made sparingly, in public interest, and not for punitive or extraneous reasons. The Corporation should consider the impact of transfers on employees' families and children's education, and should protect the seniority of transferred employees. The Court can interfere with transfer orders if they are found to be unfair, arbitrary, or discriminatory.
Final Decision: The Court directed the Corporation to consider withdrawing the transfer orders, protecting seniority, and considering the petitioners' requests for cancellation of transfers due to humanitarian grounds and educational impact. It also emphasized the need for transfers to be made sparingly and in public interest, and not for punitive or extraneous reasons.
Hanumanthappa, J.
1. The petitioners in all these Petitions who are either Drivers or Conductors in the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) and working in various Divisions have filed these Petition? challenging the competency, correctness and propriety of the transfer orders transferring them from one Division to another. Since the questions for consideration in all these Petitions are almost identical, all the Petitions are clubbed together and disposed of by a Common Order.
2. The official status of the petitioners and the power of the Corporation to transfer its employees are not in dispute. The dispute is only in respect of (1) whether there can be a transfer ignoring Clause 14(c) of the Memorandum of Settlement of 1981 (in short the 1981 Settlement); (2) when the seniority of the employees appointed in a Division is maintained by the same Division, whether they are liable to be transferred to another Division; (3) when enquiries on the allegations made against the employees are pending, is it proper to transfer such employees on the basis of such allegations without enquiry; (4) whether the transfers of the petitioners can be said as administrative orders in the public interest and will improve efficiency or whether the transfers are in the nature of victimisation and with a mala fide intention on the part of the Corporation and (5) since the petitioners are all Class III employees belonging to lowest cadre, is it proper to transfer them in the middle of the year to far off places. On behalf of the petitioners learned Advocates Sriyuths Narasimhan and K. Subba Rao addressed arguments while Sri. V. Gopala Gowda and Sri. Lakshminarayana, learned Advocates, adopted the same.
3. On behalf of the Corporation its panel of Advocates Sriyuths K. Lakshminarayana Rao, B.B. Mandappa, L. Govindaraj and Smt. Manjula Devi advanced their arguments.
4. In order to answer the Points raised above it is proper to bear in mind the service conditions of the employees, Settlements which govern their service conditions including transfer and how far the Settlements bind the employees and the Corporation, Service conditions of the employees are governed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (Cadre and Recruitment) Regulations, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations). Regulation 13(4) of the Regulations defines which are the Statewise Posts and Division wise posts. It reads as under:
"(4) Statewise and Divisionwise posts:
(a) the following posts shall be Statewise posts:-
Department Posts
Mechanical Engineering (common categories) for both Mechanical Engineering Maintenance and Production: Chargemen and above. Traffic Traffic Inspector and above. Stores and Purchase Store Keeper/Stock Verifier and above. Civil Engineering Draufgtsman/Junior Engineer and above. Administration Supervisor/Senior Stenographer and above, Statistical Supervisor (Statistical) and above. Security and Vigilance Divisional Security Inspector and above. Accounts Supervisor (Account) and above.
(b) All posts other than those specified in Sub-clause (a) above shall be Divisionwise posts.
(c) Normally, the employees holding Divisionwise posts will be considered for promotion under these Regulations, in respect of promotional vacancies in the Divisionwise posts in their respective Divisions only. In respect of the employees who are transferred from one Division to another on Administrative grounds, the entire service rendered by them In the Division from which they are transferred shall count for seniority in the Division to from which they are transferred. Such transfers shall be resorted to sparingly. The employees who are transferred to another Division on request shall take seniority in the post field by them on such transfer from the date on which they report in the Division to which they are transferred.
NOTE:- "Division" means the administrative Units of the Corporation functioning as such on
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.