A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
Karnataka United School & Light Motor Vehicle Drivers Union – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, Rep. by the Secretary to the Government of Karnataka Transport Department – Respondent
1. Constitutional validity of Sub Rule (2) of Rule 6 of Karnataka Motor Vehicles (Conditions for Vehicles Engaged in Transport of School Children) Rules, 2012 (for short, ‘the Rules’) has been questioned in this writ petition.
2. The material facts are that the Parliament enacted the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Central Act 59 of 1988) (for short, ‘the Act’). S.96 of the Act empowers the State Governments to make Rules for the purpose of Chapter-V. Government of Karnataka in exercise of the power conferred by clause (xxxiii) of S.96(2) read with S.212 of the Act made the Rules under a Notification No.SARIE 01 SAEPA 2011, dated 18.01.2013 (Annexure-D). The Rules have come into force on 01.05.2013. ‘School Cab’ as per Rule 2 (1)(c), means, a contract carriage with seating capacity not exceeding 12+1 complying with the requirements with valid permit issued under S.74 of the Act. The Rules stipulate that no Owner or Operator of a Motor Vehicle shall permit the use of the vehicle as a Transport Vehicle for carriage of School Children unless he carries a valid contract carriage permit issued under S.74 of the Act, permitting the use of the vehicle for the said purpose. Rule 6 is wi
State of West Bengal & others vs. Bengal Bus Syndicate & others
Kunj Behari Lal Butail vs. State of H.P.
Pratap Chandra Mehta vs. State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh & others
Subhash Chandra & others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & others
M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India & others
Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association vs. Union of India & another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.