A.S.BOPANNA
Standard Chartered Bank rep. by its Authorized Officer Senathil Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Hon'ble District Magistrate – Respondent
1. Learned Government Advocate to accept notice for the respondent and file memo of appearance in four weeks.
2. The petitioner-Bank had instituted action for recovery of the amounts due to them from their borrowers viz., Smt. S. Kavitha and Sri Robinson Roberts Donison. Since according to the petitioner, the amount had not been repaid, action as provided under Sections 13 and 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short the 'Act') was resorted to. In that direction, the petitioner had filed an application with the respondent as contemplated under Section 14 of the Act requiring the respondent to order for taking possession of the premises. Since the application has been returned by the respondent vide the communication dated 10.01.2013, the petitioner is before this Court seeking for direction to the respondent to consider the application.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in that regard would refer to the amendment made to the Act as at Annexure-D to the petition to contend that the respondent would have the jurisdiction to entertain the application and pass appropriate orders on the same
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.