SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Kar) 532

H.BILLAPPA
L. D. Ballal – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:S.B. Pavin, K. Pradeep Naik, Advocates, T.P. Srinivasa, AGA.

Judgment :

1. In this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has called in question, the order dated 07.06.2012, passed by the Land Tribunal, Moodabidri in case No.TRL-127/1977-78 vide Annexure-A.

2. By the Impugned Order at Annexure-A, the Land Tribunal, Moodabidri, has allowed the application filed by the petitioner for amendment of Form No.7 and permitted the petitioner to amend Form No.7 by including Sy.No.212/2A measuring 3.16 acres, Sy.No.101/1B measuring 0.91 acres, Sy.No.97/8 measuring 0.16 acres. In Sy.No.97/6 to insert 6.28 acres instead of 4.50 acres.

3. Aggrieved by that, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

4. The third respondent S.M.Cardoza filed Form No.7 claiming occupancy rights in respect of Sy.No.97/6 of Pranthaya village measuring 4.50 Manja land and 1.50 acre Punja land. The Tribunal grants occupancy rights in favour of third respondent S.M.Cardoza in respect of Sy.No.97/6C measuring 6.28 acres, Sy.No.97/8 measuring 0.16 acres, Sy.No.101/1B measuring 0.91 acres, Sy.No.212/2A measuring 3.16 acres. It was challenged in W.P.No.30181/2003. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration. The respondent No.3





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top