The main legal point established is that the procedure for initiating prosecution under Section 192-A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 must be followed, including issuing a show cause notice before taking any action.

1. Though the matter is listed today for orders on the application filed for early hearing, by consent of both the sides, matter is heard for final disposal.

2. In this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., petitioner has sought for quashing the private complaint filed by respondent No.1 in PCR No.64/2011 and the order passed therein taking cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 192-A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 as also the order issuing summons to her in C.C.No.8/13.

3. Respondent No.1 filed private complaint inter alia alleging that 20 acres of coffee land in Sy.No.156 of Kadur Village in Bankal Hobli, Mudigere Taluk was granted to him by the Deputy Commissioner, Chikmagalur on 25.5.1986 and after the grant of the land, complainant took possession of the same, obtained saguvalli chit and thereafter planted coffee crop in the said property; that since the boundaries of the property granted to him was not clear, complainant requested the then tahasildar to identify the land and the said tahasildar directed the Taluka Surveyor arrayed as accused No.2 to identify the land and to grant a sketch to the complainant; that while the sketch was being done after phody the land, it was found that the husband of accused No.1 (petitioner herein) has illegally occupied about 10 acres of land in Sy.No.156 and out of that 6 acres belonged to the complainant and remaining extent of 4 acres is Government Land; that the survey also revealed that accused No.1 had encroached 5 acres of Government Land in Sy.No.156; that after the receipt of the sketch, complainant filed a writ petition before the High Court in Sy.No.156, which came to be allowed on 4.12.2008 directing the ADLR, Chikmagalur to measure the land and identify the land granted to the complainant; that on 18.10.2008, the complainant gave a petition to the Tahsildar, Mudigere to prepare a sketch pertaining to the land granted to him and subsequently, on 17.1.2009, he gave a letter to the Deputy Commissioner, Chikmagalur to measure and identify the boundary pertaining to the property that has been granted to him on 20.5.1986; that the then Tahsildar and accused No.2 colluded with the accused No.1 and also with her husband in grabbing the government property; that the survey conducted in the year 2006 clearly indicates that accused No.1 and her husband have unauthorizedly occupied 10 acres of Government land in Sy.No.156 and in respect of the same, no action has been taken against them and thus, the accused persons have committed the offence punishable under Section 192-A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

4. The learned Magistrate before whom the complaint came to be presented took cognizance of the offences, recorded sworn statement of the complainant and since accused No.2 is a public servant, was of the opinion that unless sanction is obtained under Section 197 of Cr.P.C., accused No.2 cannot be prosecuted. Therefore, the learned Magistrate directed registration of the case only against accused No.1, the petitioner herein for the offences punishable under Sections 192-A & 192-B of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and ordered issue of summons to her.

5. On coming to know of the same, petitioner has presented this petition inter alia on the ground that the order taking cognizance as well as issuance of summons to her is without jurisdiction as the procedure adopted is contrary to the law laid down by this Court in the case of Lalitha Sastry vs. State of Karnataka reported in ILR 2008 KAR 4520.

6. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on both the sides, I am of the considered opinion that the complaint presented before the learned Magistrate and the orders passed thereon are without any jurisdiction and contrary to the law laid down in the aforesaid decision.

7. Section 192-A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 deals with the offences relating to the Government lands. Even according to the allegations made in the complaint,