SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Kar) 537

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
N. Ananda, J.
Sanaulla - Appellant
Versus
M/s. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another - Respondents
Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 1951 of 2009 connected with Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 11624 of 2008
Decided On : 4.10.2012

Advocates Appeared:
Sriyuths D.R. Nagaraja and Spporthy Hegde N., for Appellant;
Sri C.R. Ravishankar, for Respondent.

Headnote:EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 - Section 3: [ N. Ananda, J] Assessment of physical disability vis-à-vis loss of earning capacity - Claimant aged 20 years - Claimant was working as cleaner suffered Type II fracture - Restricted movement of left lower limb, materially interference with his work - Loss of earning capacity assessed at 40% - Held, Claimant is entitled to compensation of Rs. 2,06,459/-.

JUDGMENT

N. Ananda, J : MFA No. 1951/2009 is filed by claimant for enhancement of compensation. MFA No. 11624/2008 is filed by Insurance Company for reduction of compensation.

2. I have heard Sri C.R. Ravishankar, learned Counsel for Insurance Company and Sri Spoorthy Hegde N., learned Counsel for claimant.

3. As per medical evidence, claimant had suffered type 2 fracture of left tibia and he underwent surgery for reduction of fracture. The claimant was aged about 20 years at the time of accident. The claimant was a cleaner by occupation. He was sustaining by physical labour. The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation having regard to medical evidence and assessment of permanent physical disability by the Medical Officer has assessed permanent physical disability vis-a-vis loss of earning capacity at 55%. The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation while assessing permanent physical disability vis-a-vis loss of earning capacity has not referred to Schedule-I to find out loss of earning capacity in relation to injuries stated therein. It cannot be disputed that the injury suffered by claimant is a non-schedule injury, yet the claimant had suffered type II fracture of left tibia and fracture has malunited. There is restricted movement of left lower limb. This would materially interfere with the work of claimant as a Cleaner.

4. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case. I assess permanent physical disability vis-a-vis loss of earning capacity at 40%.

The other facts not being in dispute, claimant is entitled to compensation of Rs. 2,06,459/- (Rs.2,280/- x 226.38 x 0.40) with interest at 12% per annum from 27.07.2007 till the date of deposit.

5. In view of the above, I pass the follow-

ORDER

MFA No. 1951/2009 filed by claimant is dismissed. MFA No. 11624/2008 filed by Insurance Company is accepted in part. Compensation of Rs. 2,83,880/- awarded by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation is reduced to Rs. 2,06,459/- with interest at 12% per annum from 27.07.2007 till the date of deposit. The amount in deposit shall be transferred to the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation at Chitradurga. If the amount deposited by Insurance Company is in excess of what has been awarded herein, the same shall be refunded to the Insurance Company.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top