ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI
Leelavathi Bai – Appellant
Versus
Tukarama Rao – Respondent
1. The parties have settled the matter and presented the memorandum of compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the C.P.C. It is signed by them and their respective learned advocates. The parties and their signatures are identified by their respective learned advocates. The parties state that they have entered into the compromise of their own volition and without any duress from anybody.
2. The memorandum of compromise petition is taken on record. It reads as follows:
"1. The above named Appellants have challenged the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2008 passed in O.S.No.9/2007 by Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District at Bangalore. This Hon'ble Court admitted the above appeal and stayed the judgment and decree of the lower court.
2. During the pendency of the appeal the Respondent Sri Tukaram Rao died leaving behind his LRs to succeed to his estates. After the demise of First Respondent his LRs were brought on record. Thereafter the Appellants and Respondents with the intervention of elders and well-wishers arrived at a conclusion to settle the dispute amicably by way of compromise. The schedule property is an agricultural land property beari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.