IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
N. Kumar and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.
Sri B.R. Ganesh and Ors.
Vs.
The State of Karnataka and Ors.
AND
Gangadharaswamy M., Y.S. Channakeshava and Prabhakar
Vs.
Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, The Chief Engineer, Yelahanka Zone, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike and The Executive Engineer Yelahanka Zone Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike
AND
Mahesh Kumar
Vs.
Urban Development Department and Ors.
Writ Petition Nos. 39337-39354 of 2012 (GM-TENDER), Writ Petition Nos. 41987-41991 of 2012 & 43598-43610 of 2012 (GM-LB BBMP) and Writ Petition Nos. 44763-44777, 45771-45785, 47597-47611, 45771-45785, 45149 and 39597 to 39599 of 2012 (GM-TEN) Alongwith Writ Petition No. 2080 of 2013 (GM-TEN)]
Decided On: 26.04.2013
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - Article 226: [N. Kumar & B.V. Nagarathna, JJ] Tender for solid waste disposal and management from all BBMP Zones - Though Court refused to exercise its discretion under Article 226, the following directions were issued in order to see that in future such mistakes do not occur - (i) The tender notification should specify the exact area, showing the area by means of a sketch of each package. (ii) A person is entitled to bid for all the packages. But, he shall not be awarded more than five packages of his choice. (iii) Benami contracts and name lending should be strictly prohibited. If a person to whom a contract is awarded is found to be a benamidar, or name lender of the officials of the Corporation or the Corporators, including nominated members, or other elected members, the said contract is liable to be terminated. (iv) There shall be no sub-contract or introduction of a new agency or clandestine arrangement for providing service. If the is assigned in any such manner, the contract is liable to termination. (v) Specifications of the vehicles must be strictly in accordance with schedule II Sl.No.4 of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling Rules), 2000. Vehicles used for transportation of wastes shall be covered. Waste should not be visible to public, nor exposed to open environment preventing their scattering. (vi) The technical evaluation must be strictly through e-portal and not through department/officials so that intervention of the authorities or outside agencies can be curbed. (vii) The mobilization of men and material as stipulated in clause 15.9.3 of the tender document should be done in the presence of RTO, the BBMP, vehicle supervisor, representatives of "Residents Welfare Association" and "Suchi Mitra". (viii) No objection certificate from representatives of "Residents Welfare Association" and "Such Mitra" is to be obtained before release of payment on the monthly bills. (ix) Once the contract is entered into, the particulars such as the name of the contactor with father’s name, the address, the phone numbers, the number of vehicles employed shall be displayed in the website of the Corporation for the information of the general public. (x) The tender notification shall be issued at last 120 days before the existing contract expires so that new contract can be awarded immediately after the expiry of the previous contract.
Further directed (1) The tender condition prescribing concession to SC/ST individual both in respect of E.M.D. amount and solvency was quashed. However, those SC/ST individuals who have secured the contract, the event of their making good the shortfall namely 90% within two months from today, their contracts shall not be cancelled; (2) The BBMP shall initiate steps to award contracts in respect of 30 packages which is awarded to B.V.G India which they have offered to surrender; (3) The contract awarded to B.V.G. India in respect of (9+3) 12 packages, where they are functioning shall not be disturbed; (4) In respect of 8 packages awarded to B.V.G. India where breach is alleged, the BBMP shall take steps immediately to resolve the dispute, and in the event the said contracts are terminated, in respect of the same also the tender process shall begin immediately; (5) While framing the tender conditions the Corporation shall bear in mind the observations and directions issued in this order supra and also the orders passed from time to time in the connected public interest litigation and the steps taken and commitment, received by the Corporation from the bulk generators of garbage, as well as industrial houses and group housing associations; (6) The terms and conditions of tender shall be in conformity with the Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000; (7) Parties to bear their own costs.
N. Kumar, J.
1. The petitioners are the existing contractors who are the service providers in collection and transportation of Municipal Solid Waste and street sweeping, cleaning of the roads, footpaths, public toilets, urinals, open spaces of the Corporation like schools, colleges, health centres, burial grounds and transportation of waste to designated sites. The petitioners have preferred these writ petitions challenging the notification issued by the respondents inviting tenders through e-procurement regarding solid waste disposal and management from all the zones of Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (hereinafter for short referred to as "the BBMP") as per the Karnataka Public Transparency Act, 2000.
BACK GROUND
2. The petitioners challenged the notification dated 30.9.2009 issued by the Corporation in W.P. No. 30417/2009 which was filed by way of a public interest litigation, where a global tender was called for integrated municipal solid waste management for doorstep collection of segregated waste, sweeping and cleaning of streets/drains, transfer of waste collected to transfer stations, etc., The said notification was challenged on the ground that tenders could not have been called as there was no elected body for the Corporation and the administrator was incharge. After service of notice, the learned counsel for the Corporation submitted that they would withdraw the notification and now that elected body has taken charge, a fresh notification would be issued. Therefore, the said Writ Petition came to be disposed of on 17.6.2010. The Corporation passed a resolution prohibiting individuals from participating in the tender process. The same was challenged by filing W.P. Nos. 5440-5458/2011 by the petitioners. An interim order of stay was passed directing the Corporation not to issue the tender notification till the next date of hearing. In the said Writ Petition a memo was filed on behalf of the respondents to the effect that, the Corporation in the meeting held on 5.2.2011 have allowed individuals to participate along with others in the tender process. Accordingly, the said Writ Petitions came to be dismissed. A tender notification came to be issued on 16.7.2011 inviting short term zone wise tenders for Solid Waste Management by the Corporation. Same was also challenged in W.P. Nos. 32832-836/2011 and other connected matters. According to the petitioners the persons who submitted the tenders were the benami persons acting for Corporators by producing the Certificates belonging to others. However, as the Corporation received single bid in respect of 2 packages out of 92 packages a decision was taken to withdraw the said tender notification dated 16.7.2011 in respect of 92 packages of all 8 zones and issue a fresh tender notification. A memo having been filed to the said effect the said Writ Petition came to be dismissed as infructuous directing the Corporation to issue fresh tender notification for solid waste management in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. A fresh tender notification dated 12.12.2011 was issued. Again the same was challenged by filing W.P. Nos. 90-121/2012. An interim order was passed in the said proceedings on 12.1.2012 permitting the petitioners therein to participate in the tender process without prejudice to their rights and contentions urged in the Writ Petitions. However, further proceedings including the opening of the tenders and consideration of the same was stayed till the next date of hearing. In pursuance of the interim order the petitioners did not submit their tenders and did not participate in the tender process. By an order dated 20-04-2012, the Corporation was permitted to process the application and they were directed to finalize the tenders and not to issue work orders until further orders. Subsequently, the said Writ Petitions came to be dismissed by an order dated 14.9.2012. Challenging the said order, W.A. Nos. 6265-96/2012 came to be filed. During the pendency of
gpt-4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.