M.F.SALDANHA, N.K.PATIL
Laxman Govindappa Kuri since dead by L. Rs. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
M.F. Saldanha, J.--We have heard the Appellant's learned Advocate as also the learned Government Advocate on merits. This appeal arises out of the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 27.8.1999 dismissing the Writ Petition No. 24958 of 1992. The Appellant's learned Advocate has submitted that on 1.8.1999 the Petitioner before the Court passed away and that this fact was not known to the Petitioner's learned Advocate as a result of which when the writ petition was taken up for hearing, the Court has heard the case and passed an order effectively against a dead person. Learned Advocate submitted that there is a well known maxim that a Court cannot pass an order against a dead person and that on this ground alone the order of the learned Single Judge will have to be set aside. What we are taking cognizance of is that the maxim in question cannot be applied in abstract or in a vacuum. The Courts have carved out that principle because on a death occurring new parties come into the picture, sometimes rights are created and rights are extinguished and taking into account all of this the practice that is prevalent and which has obtained legal sanction is that the legal repre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.