N.K. Patil, J.--Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents.

2. These two revision petitions are filed by the Petitioner-Plaintiff assailing the legality and validity of the order passed by the learned Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Belgaum on I.A. Nos. XI and XII in O.S. No. 312 of 1990.

3. The Plaintiff-Petitioner has filed a suit against the Respondents-Defendants for the decree of permanent injunction restraining them from interfering with the Petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the suit property. In the said suit, the Petitioner herein has filed I.A. Nos. XI and XII which had come up for hearing before the trial Court on 26.2.2000. The trial Court after hearing both sides has rejected the prayers sought for by the Petitioner in the said I. As on the ground that the applications have been filed by the Petitioner after the lapse of more than 9 years, seeking for relief of declaring the alleged document as null and void. Further, it is stated that the alleged transaction of sale between the Petitioner and the Respondents was brought to the notice of the Petitioner as early as on 22.8.1990 itself an