1. This contempt petition is filed complaining of disobedience of the order dated 11.07.2012 passed in Writ Petition No. 34625 of 2010.

2. The grievance of the complainant is that, the persons who are similarly placed as that of the complainant have been extended the benefit, whereas the complainant has been discriminated.

3. The respondents have filed their counter contending that, the direction is to consider the representation of the complainant in view of the order passed by this Court in W.P. Nos. 24158160 of 2011 and in accordance with law. The law declared by the Apex Court would not extend the benefit to the complainant as claimed by him and therefore in law, he is not entitled to the said benefit and they have given an endorsement to that effect.

4. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The direction which was issued by this Court reads as under:

“No prejudice will be caused to the respondents, if they are directed to consider the petitioner’s representation at Annexure-A and letter at Annexure-C, keeping in view the order of this Court in W.P. Nos. 24158160 of 2011 and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and in any event not later than si