D.H.WAGHELA, ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI
State Of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
T. Jayamma – Respondent
D.H. Waghela, CJ
1. The State Government and its authorities are in appeal to challenge order dated 26.09.2013 of learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.22961/2011, whereby a writ in the nature of mandamus is issued to the appellants herein to initiate acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and settle the compensation in accordance with law for the benefit of respondent No. 1 herein.
2. There is no dispute about the facts that the land belonging to respondent No.1 is situated within an area of 10 to 20 meters adjoining the fort of Srirangapatna, which is a protected monument as per the notification issued by the State Government, under the provisions of the Karnataka Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'). By notification dated 10.03.1998, bearing No. SKE 21 KMU 95, published in the Special Issue Part-V, Section 2C(ii) of the Karnataka State Gazette (Annexure R herein), issued under section 4 of the Act, in exercise of the powers vested under Rule 12 of the Karnataka Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules, 1966 (for short 'Rules'), an
JAYAMMA AND OTHERS v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN AND OTHERS
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA v. NARENDER ANAND AND OTHERS
Mani Subrat Jain v. State of Haryana
State of Haryana v. Subash Chander Marwaha
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar Haji Bashir Ahmed
Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Sunder Lai Jain
Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen. Coop. Society Ltd. v. Sipahi Singh
Lekhraj Sathramdas Lalvar v. N.M. Shah
Rai Shivendra Bahadur (Dr.) v. Nalanda College
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.