R.B.BUDIHAL
Mohammed Harfath – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
R.B. BUDIHAL, J.
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 and 2 under Section 439 of Cr. P.C seeking their release on bail, for the offences punishable under Sections 370(5), 370(A), 374, 344 of IPC and under Section 26 and 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act and under Section 14 of Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act and under Section 16, 17 and 18 of Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and Right to Education Act, registered in respondent police Station Crime No. 156 of 2014.
2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 and 2 also the learned HCGP for the respondent-State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 and 2 during the course of his arguments submitted that the petitioners are not the owners of the factory and they are also the co-workers working along with the boys. He made the submission that so far as the present petitioners are concerned there are no allegations that they have committed the alleged offences, the submitted that the prosecution materials go to show that when the raiding party enquired with the present petitioners that who is the owner of the factory,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.