SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Kar) 657

A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
Archibald Quadros – Appellant
Versus
Laxman Shetty, M. D. S – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Dilraj Rohit Sequeira, Advocate.

Judgment

1. The petitioner filed a private complaint, under Section 200 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 r/w. Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short the Act'), against the respondent, on 26.7.2013, in the Court of Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C at Kundapura. On 07.9.2013, the sworn statement was recorded. Exs.C1 to C-5 were marked on 21.09.2013. Criminal case against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Act was registered on 17.1.2014 and process was issued to the accused. Upon appearance, on 12.6.2014, the accused was enlarged on bail.

2. This petition was filed on 10.11.2014, invoking Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct J.M.F.C., at Kundapura, to retain C.C.No.162/2014 on his file, on the ground that the petitioner suffers from various ailments and that the doctor advised him not to travel or undergo stress and that he finds extremely difficult to go to Mysore, which is at a distance of about 300 kms.

3. Mr. Dilraj Rohit Sequeira, learned advocate, contended that, if the case against the respondent, in C.C.No.162/2014,- on the file of Additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C, Kundapura is not ordered to be retained, the peti










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top