SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Kar) 687

B.S.PATIL
CHENGALARAYAPPA KAVALI – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sri. NISHANTH A V, ADV.
Sri. H.V. MANJUNATHA, AGA

Order

1. This writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the 1st respondent – Deputy Commissioner, Kolar District, Kolar, in exercise of the powers traceable to the provision contained under Sections 3 & 5 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act’) and Clause 18 of the Karnataka Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Control Order, 1992 (for short, ‘Control Order’).

2. The Deputy Commissioner has ordered for forfeiture of 900 bags (450 quintals) of rice and has directed that the same be utilized for the purpose of distributing them to the cardholders through fair price depots under the public distribution system. He has further directed release of lorries after collecting the value of the lorries as determined by the Regional Transport Officer, Kolar.

3. Case of the petitioners is, that 1st petitioner is the owner of lorries bearing registration Nos.AP16TV6786 & AP02W6647 and 2nd petitioner is the owner of lorry bearing No.AP26X3419. All the three lorries, it is asserted, have valid All India Permit for carrying goods. The national permits for public carrier possessed by the petitioners in respect of t





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top