SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Kar) 483

H.G.RAMESH
Annasaheb – Appellant
Versus
Suresh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sri N.D.Gunde for Gunday Associates
Sri Raviraj Patil, Advocate

JUDGMENT

This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the learned VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum, in R.A.No.56/2007, dated 29th August 2009.

2. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.143/2000 for recovery of an amount of Rs.77,65875 ps. with interest at the rate of 18% and with costs of the suit. By the judgment and decree dated 27th July 2007, the trial Court decreed the suit with costs holding that plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.77,65875 ps. with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of tobacco transaction i.e., 5.4.1998 till realisation of entire suit claim. Against this, defendant-respondent filed R.A.No.56/2007 before the lower Appellate Court. By the impugned judgment and decree, the lower Appellate Court confirmed the recovery of the amount of Rs.77,65875 ps. however, payment of interest waived. Being aggrieved by the same, plaintiff is before this Court.

Heard the learned counsel for respective parties.

3. This Court on 16.6.2011 has framed the following substantial question of law for consideration :

“Whether the first appellate Court was justified in refusing interest to the appellant on the claim made in the suit from t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top