SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 77

VINEET SARAN, S.SUJATHA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
MANIPAL HEALTH SYSTEMS – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADV.
SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, ADV.

JUDGMENT

Revenue is in appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short) challenging the order dated 3.7.2009 passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal – “B” Bench, Bangalore pertaining to the assessment years 2006-2007 and 2007-08 on the following substantial questions of law:

1. Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in holding that the remuneration paid to consultant Doctors employed by the assessee hospital is not under an employer and employee relationship and therefore tax at source has to be deducted u/s. 192 of the Act and not u/s. 194J of the Act?

2. Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in holding that the lease rent paid to Medical Relief Society of South Canara under the guise of repayment of loan taken by the lessor under a supplementary agreement would not attract section 194I of the Act and tax at source need not be deducted when the said arrangement was external to deductions at source?

2. Facts in brief are:

A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted at the business premises of the ass





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top