A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
HEMALATA – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN – Respondent
Certainly. Here are the key points derived from the provided legal document:
Marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised on 30.04.2007 and was registered on 15.11.2007. The petitioner was employed prior to the marriage. After the marriage, she has left the job. On account of incompatibility, the spouses having withdrawn from each other, after issuing of a notice, respondent filed MC No.19/2013, in the Family Court, Dharwad. The petitioner, having entered appearance, filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and the same was allowed in part on 17.07.2013. The respondent was directed to pay pendentelite maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- per month from February 2013 and until further orders. Seeking modification of the said order and to enhance the pendentelite maintenance to Rs. 50,000/- per month and the litigation expenses from Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 50,000/- , this writ petition was filed on 05.08.2013. Since the order passed on I.A. No.1 on 17.07.2013 by the Family Court was not honoured, in that, interim maintenance and litigation expenses as ordered was not paid, MC No.19/2013 was dismissed on 05.11.2013. To set aside the said order and to restore MC No.19/2013, respondent has filed Civil Misc. No.2/2013 in the Family
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.