SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 171

A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
HEMALATA – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
SRI. MALLIKARJUN S HIREMATH, ADV.
SRI. SHRIKANT T PATIL, ADV.

Judgement Key Points

Certainly. Here are the key points derived from the provided legal document:

  • The court has the authority to modify maintenance orders and to expedite the resolution of the original case. The respondent is required to pay interim maintenance and litigation expenses until the case is fully decided. (!)
  • The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 30.04.2007 and registered on 15.11.2007. Post-marriage, the petitioner left her employment, and due to incompatibility, the spouses separated. The respondent filed a maintenance case, and the petitioner sought an increase

Order

Marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised on 30.04.2007 and was registered on 15.11.2007. The petitioner was employed prior to the marriage. After the marriage, she has left the job. On account of incompatibility, the spouses having withdrawn from each other, after issuing of a notice, respondent filed MC No.19/2013, in the Family Court, Dharwad. The petitioner, having entered appearance, filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and the same was allowed in part on 17.07.2013. The respondent was directed to pay pendentelite maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- per month from February 2013 and until further orders. Seeking modification of the said order and to enhance the pendentelite maintenance to Rs. 50,000/- per month and the litigation expenses from Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 50,000/- , this writ petition was filed on 05.08.2013. Since the order passed on I.A. No.1 on 17.07.2013 by the Family Court was not honoured, in that, interim maintenance and litigation expenses as ordered was not paid, MC No.19/2013 was dismissed on 05.11.2013. To set aside the said order and to restore MC No.19/2013, respondent has filed Civil Misc. No.2/2013 in the Family













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top