N.K.PATIL, RATHNAKALA
K. Usman Shafi – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
Rathnakala, J.
1. These appeals are by the aggrieved petitioner of W.P. Nos. 16503 and 17067 to 17069 of 2004, wherein, the learned Single Judge vide order dated 7-12-2011 disposed of the said writ petitions on certain terms. To align the events in chronological order:
The appellant's father namely Kunhimonu alias Iddina Beary was a protected tenant under respondents 3 and 4 in respect of lands located in Upinangadi Village, Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District. He filed Form 7 seeking confirmation of occupancy rights before the Land Tribunal, Puttur Taluk, as follows:
Under respondent 3 the lands in Survey No. 42/3 to an extent of 2 acres 50 cents, in Survey No. 43/5 to an extent of 3 acres 63 cents, in Survey No. 42/4 to an extent of 10 cents; under respondent 4 in respect of lands in Survey No. 41/2 to an extent of 1 acre 58 cents, in Survey No. 41/1B to an extent of 0.51 cents, in Survey No. 42/2 to an extent of 1 acre 90 cents, respectively. His application was numbered as LRYT No. 3334/74-75. Respondents 5 to 7 also filed similar applications in respect of some of the above lands, the application of respondent 5 was registered in LRYT No. 917/75-76 and that of respond
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.