R.B.BUDIHAL
Gowramma – Appellant
Versus
Rangappa – Respondent
This appeal is preferred being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 1.8.2007 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) and Additional CJM, Arasikere in R.A. No.62/2003 dismissing the appeal and confirming judgment and decree dated 30.6.2003 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) at Arasikere in O.S.No.235/1999.
2. Appellant Nos. 1(a) to 1(g) are the legal representatives of plaintiff No.1 and appellant No.2 was plaintiff No.2. The respondent herein was the defendant. The case of the parties before the trial court was that the 1st plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit for declaration that she is having half share in the suit schedule properties and also for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties and also for mesne profits.
3. It is the case of the Appellants/plaintiffs that suit schedule property originally belonged to one Chennabasappa son of Nanjappa of Byrapur village. The said Chennabasappa sold the suit schedule property under registered sale deed dated 26.1.1956 in favour of 1st plaintiff and the defendant. From the date of purchase, the 1st plaintiff and defendant were in joint possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. The defend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.