Aravind Kumar
Lingarajaiah – Appellant
Versus
H. N. Jambappa – Respondent
Aravind Kumar, J.
1. Decree holder in execution petition No. 181/1998 had filed I.A. No. 15 under Order 21 Rule 95 read with Section 151 CPC seeking delivery of possession of schedule property which came to be dismissed by I Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn) & CJM, Shimoga by order dated 08.06.2010 and same is sought for being revised in this revision petition.
2. I have heard the arguments of Sri M. Rudraiah, learned Advocate appearing for petitioner - Decree Holder and Sri Prithvi Wodeyar, learned Advocate appearing for respondent - Judgment Debtor. Parties are referred to as per their rank in Executing Court.
3. Facts in brief leading to the filing of this revision petition are as under:
Decree holder had filed a suit O.S. No. 222/1996 on the file of Civil Judge (Sr. Dn), Shimoga for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,15,500/- against respondent herein. Said suit came to be decreed on 27.03.1998. Even prior to the suit being decreed, petitioner had obtained an order of attachment before judgment of respondent - judgment debtor's property, which is the subject matter of the execution proceedings.
On account of non payment of decretal amount, petitioner filed an execution petition in Ex. No. 181
Ganpal Singh (Dead) by L.Rs. v. Kailash Shankar & Others reported in AIR 1987 SC 1443.
Ratan Bapu Patil (Dead) by L.Rs. & Others v. Dathu & Others reported in AIR 2005 SC 1500.
Pattam Khander Khan v. Pattam Sardar Khan reported in (1996) 5 SCC 48
Balakrishnan v. Malaiyandi Konar reported in AIR 2006 SC 1458
Ganpat Singh (dead) by L.Rs. v. Kailash Shankar and Ors. 1987 (3) SCC 146).
Ganapat Singh (dead) by L.Rs. v. Kailash Shankar & Others reported in AIR 1987 SC 1443
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.