1. Defendant No.2 in O.S.No.10198/1998 on the file of the XXVIII Addl. City Civil Judge, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru, aggrieved by the order dated 16.11.2012 rejecting the application under Sections 33 and 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, for short ‘Act’ has presented this petition.

2. Respondents jointly instituted O.S.No.10198/1998 for recovery of vacant possession of ‘A’ and ‘B’ suit schedule properties, arraigning the lessee, as 1st inducted by 1st defendant and those defendant as tenants of portions of the suit schedule properties, as defendants 2 to 85, asserting that plaintiffs jointly executed a rental agreement in favour of 1st defendant extending lease of the vacant land for 99 years on payment of ground rent and permitting erection of commercial complex and induct tenants and on expiry of the term of lease, possession be handed over to the plaintiffs. On the allegation that the 1st defendant committed breach of the terms of the rental agreement, the suit instituted.

3. Petitioner arraigned as 2nd defendant filed written statement opposing the suit, advancing amongst others, the plea that the suit was not properly valued for purpose of Court fee. An issue when not