SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 338

High Court of Karnataka (Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi)
RAVI MALIMATH & R.B. BUDIHAL, JJ.
The State through Aland Police Station – Appellant
Versus
Arvind & Others – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 3525 of 2009
Decided On : 08-04-2015

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant: Prakash Yeli, Addl. SPP.
For the Respondents:R1-R6, G.G. Doddamani, R7-R11, Baburao Mangane, Advocates.

Headnote:INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - Section 300: [Ravi Malimath & Budihal R.B., JJ] Murder - Omission by prosecution witness to state about material facts of some objects such as weapons etc. lying at the spot, in complaint - Evidence of another prosecution witness inconsistent with case of prosecution about number of weapons used - Fact whether statement of witness was recorded before conducting inquest mahazar, over dead body, supporting defence of accused that police have created papers according to their convenience - Abnormal conduct of eye-witness about not informing incident which he had seen to any of family members of deceased or his family members - Opinion of medical officers that there was no possibility of causing injuries as alleged, on deceased by using material objects, relied upon by prosecution - Material objects not referred to medical officers for their opinion - Evidence of medical officers also inconsistent with evidence of prosecution witnesses - Seizure of weapon was not in accordance with requirements of Section 27 of Evidence Act - Evidence of finger print expert not inspiring confidence - Held, Order of acquittal is proper.

Judgment :-

1. This appeal is preferred by the State through Aland police station being aggrieved by the judgment and order of acquittal dated 13.3.2008 passed by the Fast Track Court-V, Gulbarga, in S.C. No.296/2005 acquitting the respondents-accused of the offences punishable under sections 120B, 109, 143, 147, 148, 341, 302 read with section 149 of IPC.

2. The appellant has preferred the appeal on the grounds urged at Sl. Nos.1 to 18 of the appeal memorandum.

3. C.W.1-Lingaraj @ Shrishail, son of Shankarrao Denki, resident of Kadaganchi village, permanently residing at Gulbarga lodged a complaint as per Ex.P.1 stating that there is one Sri. Shantalingeshwar Mutt in Kadaganchi village and Gadigeyya Gurushanthaiah, the Matadhipathi of the said Mutt expired and thereafter, as per the customs and traditions of the Mutt, Sri. Somayya Swamy ought to have been brought as Matadhipathi to the said Mutt, instead, one Veerabhadrashivacharya of Matamari village, District Raichur was brought as a Matadhipathi at the instance of one Karabasappa s/o.Shivabasappa Naroni and Sri. Somayya Swamy had been made to leave the Kadaganchi village. Due to this development, it led to disturbance of peace and harmony in the village. Sri. Shantalingeshwar Mutt was having the landed property of about 150-160 acres and Karabasappa Naroni himself was enjoying the income of the said Mutt. For this reason, Revanasiddappa, the elder brother of the complainant, and some leaders in the village were opposing the act of Karabasappa Naroni. Karabasappa Shivappa Naroni started to trouble some of the persons in the village and the said Karabasappa Naroni was murdered at Gulbarga in 1984. In the said case, Revanasiddappa, the elder brother of the complainant, who is deceased in this case, was also one of the accused and in the year 1987, Revanasiddappa was acquitted from the case. In connection with death of Karabasappa, the brothers and relatives of Karabasappa started their illegal acts and attrocities and caused loss to the properties of the complainant. Thereafter, one Arvind Basannappa Naroni, the nephew of Karabasappa Naroni formed a group in the village. In the year 1989, one Iranna Khyar was murdered. In the said case, Arvind Naroni was the main accused along with others and then, all the accused were acquitted from the said case. In the year 1994, there was double murder. In the year 1995 also, again, there was double murder. Even in that case also, Arvind Naroni, Chandrakanth Naroni, Gangadhar, Machendra Naroni, Vittal Naroni, Satish Naroni, Shanthappa Naroni and others were the accused persons, and the persons, who were murdered, were the supporters of Revanasiddappa Denki. Since 20 years, the said persons were having enmity with Revanasiddappa, the brother of the complainant and made an attempt to commit his murder. In the complaint, the complainant has stated that he suspects that the said persons have committed the murder of his brother.

4. On 5.7.2005, morning at 11.00 a.m., Revanasiddappa Denki, the elder brother of the complainant informed the complainant over phone that himself and Madhavarao Patil of Muddadaga together going to Aland on the cycle motor of Madhavarao Patil. In the evening at 6.45 p.m., Beeranna Waggi - PW.4 informed the complainant over phone that his brother Revanasiddappa and Madhavrao were dashed with the jeep and his brother is also murdered by throwing stone on him and Madhavrao Patil has been assaulted severely. Then the complainant become perplex and himself and his father-in-law Revansiddappa Dhotre went to Aland Government Hospital and saw that his brother already dead and Madhavrao Patil was shifted to Gulbarga for further treatment. Complainant came to know that the said incident took place about 5.45 p.m. on 05.07.2005. The main reason for the said incident is in connection with Shantalingeshwar Mutt of their village and because of the said enmity, with criminal conspiracy to finish off the brother of the complainant, 1) A


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top