SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 389

R.B.BUDIHAL
S. Armugum – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

This appeal is preferred by appellant/accused No.2 being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction dated 25.06.2011 passed in Spl.CC.No.6/2006 by the Special Judge, Bangalore Urban District, Bangalore, convicting and sentencing the appellant to undergo RI for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to pay the fine amount he shall undergo SI for a period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the complaint Ex.P-3 is that one Shylendra Babu S/o C.Shankar Reddy, who is PW-2, lodged the complaint alleging that his father acquired the property measuring 1 acre 29 guntas in Sy.No.102/4 in Challakere Village Ring Road near Hennur Bansawadi Road. BDA acquired 23 guntas in said Sy.No.102/4 for the purpose of formation of ring road. Alternatively BDA gave three sites in HRBR Layout Block No.1 measuring 50 x 80 feet registered in the name of father of the complainant. To get the khata in respect of said sites, applications were filled in the name of his father and about six months back the same were submitted with Bangalore








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top