SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 387

R.B.BUDIHAL
B. N. Swamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

” This appeal is preferred by the appellant accused being aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence dated 6.12.2010 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Spl.Case No.71/2007 on the grounds mentioned at ground Nos.7 to 19 of the appeal memorandum.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the Lokayuktha police filed charge-sheet against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short the ' Act-” ). The accused was working as FDA in Mysuru Urban Development Authority, Mysuru on 15.9.2006. When the complainant N. Krishna approached him for issue of sale deed, the accused demanded Rs.1,000/- from the complainant as gratification other than legal remuneration as motive for showing official favour. Pursuant to the said demand, the accused accepted the sum of Rs.1,000/- from the complainant on 16.9.2006 as illegal gratification and he being the public servant has misused his official position and by corrupt or illegal means, obtained pecuniary advantage to an extent of Rs.1,000/- for himself from the complainant. Hence, case was registere































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top