SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 453

A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
GOWRAMMA – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIKANTHIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
SRI K.N. NITISH FOR SRI K.V. NARASIMHAN, ADV.
SRI A.V. GANGADHARAPPA, ADV.

ORDER

Challenge in this petition is to an order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, allowing in part, a revision petition filed by the respondent, under S.397 Cr.P.C. The Magistrate at Koratagere had directed the respondent to pay maintenance to the petitioner, at the rate of Rs.3,000/- p.m. from 02.02.2009. Assailing the said order, the criminal revision petition was filed.

2. The material facts to be stated for deciding of this petition are, that the petitioner and her son had filed C.Mis.No.23/1994 against the respondent. After contest, the petition was allowed on 04.11.1995 and each of the petitioners therein was held entitled to the payment of maintenance at Rs.300/- p.m.

3. After a lapse of about ten years, alleging change in circumstances, C.Mis.No.55/2006 was filed by the petitioner, under S.127(1) of Cr.P.C. to enhance the maintenance amount to Rs.3,000/- p.m. and direct the respondent to pay the same. The petition having been stoutly contested, during the proceedings before the learned Magistrate, the wife – petitioner examined herself and the respondent – husband examined himself. Learned Magistrate finding that the salary income of the respondent as gone up and that the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top