SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Kar) 401

B.VEERAPPA
KASTUREVVA – Appellant
Versus
JAYASHREE – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SRI. B V SOMAPUR, ADV.

ORDER :

The petitioner/plaintiff has filed the above writ petition for quashing of the impugned compromise judgment and decree decree dated 28.02.2006 and 6.3.2006 made in O.S. No.81/2004 on the file of Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Ramdurga, and for restoration of the suit on its file mainly on the ground that the impugned compromise judgment and decree of the Court below is improper and illegal and the said compromise decree obtained by the defendant is a fraudulent act committed by son-in-law of the petitioner, who is the cousin brother of respondent.

2. The facts of the case are as under:

The plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant contending that the land bearing Sy.No.250/1 measuring 4 acres 7 guntas situated at Mallur village, Kagadhal Taluk, Saundatti. The plaintiff is the mother-in-law of the defendant. Defendant is the wife of the deceased Basavaraddi Bhimappa Basuraddi. The deceased Basavaraddi is the son of the plaintiff. The defendant led the marital life with the deceased Basavaraddi for about one year and thereafter, the relation of the defendant strained with this plaintiff and the deceased Basavaraddi and the defendant



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top