SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Kar) 1152

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
H.N. Nagamohan Das, J.
In Re: Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd. —Respondent
Company Petition No. 58 of 2009
Decided on : 31-03-2010

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. K.G. Raghavan, Dua Associates, for the Appellant
Mr. B. Pramod, Central Government Counsel, Regional Director, for the Respondent

Deviation from accounting standards is not impermissible, and the fairness and reasonableness of a scheme of arrangement must be considered.

Headnote:

Companies Act - Scheme of Arrangement - Sections 391 - 394 - The judgment discusses the petitioner-company's scheme of arrangement seeking sanction under Sections 391 - 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court examines the scheme's compliance with accounting standards and Section 211 of the Act, referencing relevant case law and the petitioner's undertaking affidavits to ultimately sanction the scheme with modifications.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner-company filed a petition seeking sanction of a scheme of arrangement under Sections 391 - 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The scheme proposed to create a business restructuring reserve and set off restructuring expenses against it. The Registrar of Companies opposed the scheme, alleging violations of accounting standards and Section 211 of the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered relevant case law and the petitioner's undertaking affidavits, ultimately sanctioning the scheme with modifications, finding it to be just and reasonable and not against the interest of the shareholders.

Issues: The main issue was whether the scheme of arrangement complied with accounting standards and Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on case law to establish that deviation from accounting standards is not impermissible and that the scheme's fairness and reasonableness must be considered. The petitioner's undertaking affidavits also influenced the court's decision.

Final Decision: The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement with modifications, finding it to be just and reasonable and binding on the petitioner-company and its shareholders.

JUDGMENT

H.N. Nagamohan Das, J.—The petitioner-company has filed this petition under Sections 391 - 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short "the Act"), seeking sanction of the scheme of arrangement as per annexure A.

2. The petitioner-company was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, in the year 1989 in the State of Gujarat. Between 1989 and 2000 the petitioner-company changed its name several times and also its registered office. At present the name of the petitioner-company is Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd., and its registered office is situated at Bangalore in the State of Karnataka. The main objects of the petitioner-company as set out in the memorandum of association are as under:

(a) to establish, acquire, run, operate, provide services and design, development and implementation of turn key solutions both in hardware and software for infocom markets.

(b) To manufacture, produce, work, distribute, buy and sell, import and export or otherwise to deal in all kinds of electronic hardware and software for computer systems and allied products.

3. The annual report 2007-08 containing the audited profit and loss account and the balance-sheet of the petitioner-company is at annexure C.

4. The board of directors of the petitioner-company in their meeting held on January 17, 2009, passed a resolution approving the draft scheme of arrangement as per annexure D. Under the draft scheme of arrangement the petitioner-company proposes to create a business restructuring reserve from out of the securities premium account to an extent of 50 per cent, and to use the said reserve for restructuring expenses. The salient features of the draft scheme of arrangement are as follows:

(A) The scheme of arrangement is between the petitioner-company and its equity shareholders, wherein the petitioner-company shall set off the restructuring expenses incurred/to be incurred in the process of business restructuring of the petitioner-company, against the business restructuring reserve to be created from the securities premium account of the petitioner-company, pursuant to Sections 391 - 394 and other applicable provisions of the Act.

(B) The scheme, shall come into operation from the appointed date, i.e., April 1, 2008, or such other date as the hon'ble High Court may fix and shall however become effective only from the effective date.

(C) Pursuant to the scheme of arrangement, the treatment in the books of account of the petitioner-company will be as follows:

(i) With effect from the appointed date, a sum being 50 per cent, of the amount lying to the credit of the securities premium account, as appearing in the books of account of the petitioner-company as at the appointed date, shall be credited to the "business restructuring reserve account (BRB).

(ii) With effect from the appointed date, the restructuring expenses, as defined in Clause 1.5 of the scheme of arrangement, to the extent incurred by the petitioner-company and till the availability of balance in the business restructuring reserve account, shall be debited to the "business restructuring reserve account" in the stand alone and consolidated financials of the petitioner-company and consequently such expenses shall not be charged to the debit of the profit and loss account of the petitioner-company.

(iii) With effect from the appointed date, for the limited purpose of consolidation of the financials of the petitioner-company on every balance-sheet date, such expenses as are in the nature of restructuring expenses but are incurred by the subsidiaries of the petitioner-company and debited to their respective profit and loss accounts, shall be disclosed as adjustment against the balance in the business restructuring reserve account of the petitioner-company, if any, as on the relevant balance-sheet date as if such expenses were incurred by the petitioner-company and corresponding adjustment will be made by reducing the relevant expense in the consolidated profit and loss account.

(iv) The amount









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top