ARAVIND KUMAR
H. Asadulla Shariff – Appellant
Versus
H. Asadulla Shariff – Respondent
Arvind Kumar , J.—This is a defendants appeal questioning the correctness and legality of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.4692/2007 dated 10-4-1997 on the file of the VIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore whereunder the suit filed by the appellants for declaration came to be dismissed.
2. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as under and the parties are referred to as per their rank in the trial Court.
2.1. The plaintiffs instituted a suit in O.S. No.4692/1997 on the file of the City Civil Court, Bangalore, seeking the following relief:
(i) To declare that the plaintiffs as the absolute owners of the schedule property and that the defendants have no manner of right, title or interest in the property;
(ii) To issue an order of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property in any manner;
(iii) To declare that the sale deed registered as No.8244 dated 28.4.1994 at pages 71-74 in Book I Volume 5086 of 1993-94 between the defendants as null and void; and
(iv) To grant such other consequential relief including costs as this Hon ble Court deem fit in the circumstances of
Deena (dead) through L.Rs. V. Bharat Singh (dead) through L.Rs. and others
Arm Group Enterprises Ltd. V. Waldorf Restaurant and others
Chota Uddandu Sahib V. Masthan Bi and others
Inspector General of Registration and Stamps V. Smt. Tayappa Begum
Dudh Nath Pandey (dead by L.Rs.) V. Suresh Chandra Bhattasali
Chikkam Koteswara Rao V. Chikkam Subbarao and others
Sait Tarajee Khimchand & others V. Yelamarti Satyam and others reported in AIR 1971 SC 1865
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.