SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Kar) 927

K.L.MANJUNATH, B.V.NAGARATHNA
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Konkan Marine Agencies – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
Mr. M.V. Seshachala, for the Appellant
Mr. S. Parthasarathi, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

B.V. Nagarathna, J.— This appeal is filed by the Revenue being aggrieved by the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in I. T. A. No. 670/Bang/2000, dated May 17, 2004.

2. The relevant facts of the case are that the respondent-assesses who is carrying on business as stevedoring, clearing and forwarding agents and is being assessed in the status of a firm. For the assessment year 1996-97, the assessee had filed return of income which was processed under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act and with respect to profit and loss account a sum of Rs. 32,32,601 was debited as stevedoring charges. On verifying these expenses claimed, it was found by the Assessing Officer that the assessee had produced certain self-made vouchers endorsed by the assessee's own employees and that these were other than the regular salary and other allowances which itself was taxable under the provisions of the Act. Therefore, the Assessing Officer found that in the absence of proper vouchers expenses claimed by the assessee could not be allowed in respect of four items, viz.,

(Rs.)

(a) Incentive paid to dock w















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top