IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
H.V.G. Ramesh, J.
Guru Dattathreya Peeta Devasthana Samvardhana Samithi S/o Srinivasa Bhat, Srinivasa —Appellant
Vs.
Commissioner for Religious and Charitable Endowments in Karnataka, Sri Syed Ghouse Mohinddin Shah Khadri S/o late Syed Peer Mohammed Shah Khadri, Sajjada Nasheen, Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner —Respondent
AND
Syed Bandagi Hussaini Shakadri S/o Syed Shaha Ali Hussaini Shakhadri, S.M.S. Motors —Appellant
Vs.
State of Karnataka - by its Chief Secretary, Commissioner for Religious and Charitable Endowments in Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner and Sri Syed Shouse Mohijuddin Sha Khadri Sajjada Nasheen —Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 38148/2000, 4262/ 2002 and 43621 of 2003
Decided on : 14-02-2007
Sajjada - Religious Institution - Karnataka Religious & Charitable Institutions Act, 1927 - The court considered the appointment of Shah Khadri in place of Sajjadanashin and the entitlement of the petitioner to be appointed as Sajjadanashin or Shah Khadri. The court held that the appointment of the Committee to administer the affairs regarding management of the property and finance is legal. The court directed the Committee to consider the appointment of Shah Khadri based on the enquiry to be held and the eligibility of the petitioners. The court also quashed an order and remanded the matter back to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders in accordance with law after holding due enquiry.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash an order appointing a Shah Khadri in place of Sajjadanashin and claimed entitlement to the post. Another petitioner sought to quash an order codifying the practice of a religious institution. The court considered the appointment of Shah Khadri and the entitlement of the petitioners to the post.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the appointment of the Committee to administer the affairs regarding management of the property and finance is legal. The court directed the Committee to consider the appointment of Shah Khadri based on the enquiry to be held and the eligibility of the petitioners. The court also quashed an order and remanded the matter back to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders in accordance with law after holding due enquiry.
Ratio Decidendi: The appointment of the Committee to administer the affairs regarding management of the property and finance is legal. The court directed the Committee to consider the appointment of Shah Khadri based on the enquiry to be held and the eligibility of the petitioners.
Final Decision: WP 43621/2003 is allowed in part and remanded back to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders in accordance with law after holding due enquiry. WP 38148/2000 and 4262/2002 are disposed of in terms of the above order.
H.V.G. Ramesh, J.--The petitioner in WP 38148/2000, claiming to be the Sajjada of Hazrath Dada Hayath Meer Khalendar Sree Guru Dattatreya Baba Buden Swamy's Dargha has filed this petition seeking for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other relief to quash the order dated 29.11.2000 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Chikmagalur District and the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Mysore dated 17.11.2000 and, to quash annexures N & O - the proceedings of the Government and to issue a writ of mandamus to direct respondents 2 and 3 from interfering with the peaceful management and administration of the said Dargha and Peetha and for such other orders.
2. According to the petitioner, Guru Dattatreya Baba Budan Swamy's Dargha situate at Bababudangiri Hills at Chikmagalur District is an ancient important institution held in high esteem by Hindus and Mohammedans and is worshiped by large number of pilgrims all over India. According to him, it is presided by the Sajjaada or Matadhipathi and the said religious office of Sajjadanashin is a hereditary office. The history of the shrine was published in the year 1930 in V:5 of the Mysore Gazette. It is averred in the petition that the annual Urs of all the saints will be conducted along with the Urs of Dada Hayath Khalender Dattatreya Swamy. There are buildings like Langer Khana, Chilla Khana, Musafir Khana, Fakir Chowk and Office. There is a Mujawar appointed by the Sajjada to perform daily rites inside the cave and he is the one who enters the sanctum sanctorum of the institution and distributes Thirtha to devotees of both the communities and he also lights the Nandadeepa and puts flowers to the Paduka. The recognised Hindu Gurus of different mutts are also taken inside the cave gate to offer their respects to the paduka. The Mujawar takes Sambrani and performs religious rituals inside the main shrine between 7.00 and 8.00 pan. daily. According to this petitioner, Sajjada performs the Urs of Dada and all other saints as per the prevailing customs and offers Fateha and no other functions apart from the Urs is conducted from the said Dargah. It is a hereditary seat and the Sajjada appointed by management of Dada Hayath is conducting the daily rituals from tune immemorial and only Syeds can be the Swamis of the Mattas.
3. The grandfather and father or the petitioner were recognised as Sajjada as per annexure B dated 4.6.1945. The deceased Syed Peer Mohammed Shah Khadri had sent letters to the Tahsildar, Chikmagalur Taluk on 20.1.1995 and 22.9.1999 informing about the nomination of the petitioner as Sajjada and similar letter was sent to the Commissioner for Religious & Charitable Endowments on 21.10.1999, at Bangalore regarding his nomination as Sajjada which are at annexures C, D and E. The petitioner is officiating as Sajjada from the date or death of his father.
4. According to the petitioner, on 29.11.2000 annexure F, he received a letter to the effect that he was nominated as a Member of the Executive Committee of Guru Dattatreya Swamy Bababudan Dargha and also the proceedings of the Government wherein he was recognised as a Shah Khadri and not as Sajjada and that he has to perform religious rituals and the management and administration is taken over by the Muzrai Department and that Urs and Datta Jayanthi will be performed by the Committee appointed by the Muzrai Department. The said order has been passed as per the provisions of Chapter VIII Rule 1 of the Mysore Muzrai Manual. The said Manual has no statutory powers under which annexure F was passed. The Manual is only an instruction by the then government of the Maharaja of Mysore in the form of administrative instructions. The Karnataka Religious & Charitable Institutions Act of 1927 came into force on 1.4.1927 whereas as per Rule 11 of the Mysore Muzrai Manual, the Rules were issued on 11th February 1852 by the then Commissioner for Management of the affairs of the Devasthanams and Chatrams. The Committee can be appointe
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.