A.M. Farooq, J.—This is a Plaintiff's second appeal under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure. The Plaintiff--appellant is aggrieved by the decree dated 28.7.1986 in O.S. No. 34 of 1979 on the file of the learned Civil Judge, Ramanagaram, and confirmed in appeal in Regular Appeal No. 96 of 1989, dated 1.8.1997 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Session Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the Plaintiff filed the suit for declaration of title and consequential injunction in respect of the suit schedule property alleging that the property belonged to his father and that it was a choultry assessed to Municipal Tax and in due course of time the choultry collapsed and small portion of it remained as a small room in a dilapidated condition. That the Municipality exempted property tax and after the death of his father the Plaintiff is having possession and enjoyment of the property. That the katha of the property was changed from 261 in 1902 to 356/31 in 1970 and the number was later changed to 634/356 which is the existing katha number. That the Defendants 1 and 2 have set title to the suit property on the ground that i