SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 653

V.K.SINGHAL, T.N.VALLINAYAGAM
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Mysore Minerals Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. E.R. Indrakumar, for the Appellant
Mr. A.S. Krishnamurthy, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following two questions of law arising out of its order dated December 26, 1991, in respect of the assessment year 1986-87 under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in coming to the conclusion that the original assessment which granted the relief under Sections 32A and 80-I to the assessee was not erroneous and the inference of the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 was. not proper ?

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that extracting granite from quarry and cutting it to various sizes and polishing should be considered as manufacture or production of any article or thing and the assessee's business activity must be considered as industrial undertaking for the purpose of granting reliefs under Sections 32A and 80-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?"

2. The assessee is a public limited company. The business of the assessee is extracting granite from quarry, converting the same to slabs, polishing and cutting before effecting the sale of the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top